The magazine of the Ramblers - Contact Ramblers Join Ramblers - link to ramblers.org.uk

Will Self: Don’t drive to walk

will_self_300dpi_credit_jerry_bauerBest-selling author Will Self argues that urban-fleeing walkers’ tunnel vision of the countryside is both damaging and self-defeating…

The modern rambling movement began with a mass trespass on Kinder Scout in the Peak District, but in my view what’s needed now is a mass exodus. The last time I was on Kinder Scout workmen were hard at it, laying a stone-flagged staircase all the way up from Edale. Even when I gained the ridge, I saw that more stone-flagging lay ahead of me, as if wayward Romans had been building wonky roads. Actually, the Roman analogy isn’t that misplaced, because in the last 20 years legions of walkers have invaded the British hinterland intent on stealing beauty.

I say ‘intent’, but really, where’s the beauty to be found? It’s difficult to commune with nature when there are scores of other communards, just as it’s impossible to venture into the wild if it’s overpopulated by the civilised. Of course, I realise that if you get a little bit further off the beaten – or stone-flagged – track, you’ll soon find all the solitude you desire, but there remains something profoundly disturbing about the way our most celebrated areas of natural beauty are becoming replete with the same urban infrastructure we’re trying to get away from: car parks, gift shops, cafés – and now these metalled paths that mimic the motorways most visitors have driven along in order to get there.

I blame the English Romantics: their obsession with the picturesque spread with lightning speed. When Wordsworth was still living at Dove Cottage in Grasmere, trippers were already pitching up armed with wooden frames through which to descry the surrounding fells. Two hundred years on that frame has become completely internalised, so that we head en masse for such locations, where we goggle at prospects that have already been worn smooth by our regard.

Unfortunately, it’s a lose-lose situation: not only is our hunt for the unspoilt a spoliation, but the correlate of this is that we have little regard for the places where we actually live. Whether it’s fly-tipping or lousy architecture, littering or insensitive planning, the urban environment is endlessly traduced by not just commercial imperatives but our own studied lack of regard. Why bother? – we say to ourselves. After all, we’re effectively powerless when it comes to prettifying our immediate surroundings, so our best possible defence is to get out at the weekend for a good long walk somewhere lovely.

And as we drive along the motorways and arterial roads en route for our aesthetic route march, we give scant thought to the areas of outstanding

man-made ugliness that we’re passing through. But it’s precisely our tunnel vision that’s making the parts of Britain where the majority of people live a miserable concrete bollix, and that’s why we should stop driving to walk at all. The car is the sworn enemy of the walker in every shape and form: they stink, they’re noisy, they’re dangerous, and they – or rather their drivers – are responsible for the most egregious and insensitive modifications to the British landscape since its Iron Age deforestation. Driving to take a walk is a solecism on a par with shooting people in the cause of universal peace and harmony. My view is if you can’t take a train or a bus to do a walk, then don’t do it at all.

Besides, if you get out of the habit of driving to walk then you’re immediately thrown back into the purlieus of your own home. I almost always walk directly from my home – and this despite the fact I live in central London. True, it may take an entire day to reach open country, but by God I feel I’ve earned it when I see those green fields. Moreover, by consistently walking through the built environment I make my peace with it. In part, I conceded, this is because I’ve developed a kind of anti-Romanticism, whereby the ugly is experienced as beauty. In part it’s because I’ve learnt the byways and riversides, so that I can trek through town in the most bucolic possible way. But mostly it’s because I am entirely liberated from the awful sensation you get – especially when contemplating the ‘CAR PARK FULL’ sign at Grasmere or Edale – that the world is replete, and that, as Thomas De Quincey (another of the awful Romantics) put it: ‘the human being is in these parts a weed’. My message is: learn to appreciate the ruderals growing on the motorway embankment near to your house, and you needn’t feel weed-choked at all.

Will Self’s latest book, Psycho Too, is a collection of his walking pieces for the Independent published by Bloomsbury (£20, ISBN 9781408802281)

  12 Responses to “Will Self: Don’t drive to walk”

      At 10:40 am on March 2nd, 2010 John Smith wrote:

    Will Self is absolutely right on several points. But there is a real world between the extremes in which Will Self poses, postulates and pontificates for the purpose of self promotion.

    How right he is about towns and cities. It always gave me pleasure and saved me money to walk around London on both business and pleasure trips. It took very little longer than using public transport and opened up wonders of the city that were hidden from those isolated in vehicles. There are severely limited justifications for using cars in cities.

    How right Will Self is to condemn the way we have damaged those special locations that are the first thoughts as leisure destinations for those with limited imagination. It is lunatic to drive great distances to take short walks. I live in the south east, so the Lake District, Peak District, Scotland, Wales and the West Country are all safe from me.

    But how blinkered he is to ignore where real ramblers walk and where most footpaths are and where more peace, fulfilment and wonders that he can imagine are to be found. I limit my travel so I rarely move beyond the Surrey Hills. Even here, I avoid the over used and over popular locations and I seek out starting points down country lanes where a bus could not go unless we widened the lane to A road standards and accepted the smell, noise and danger they would cause in an inappropriate location. Instead I drive for perhaps half an hour or so to an isolated car park, walk for five or six hours and then drive home. I don’t think I could manage to walk 15 miles to the start and then 15 miles back again. Without using my car, most footpaths would be denied to me and I find it difficult to accept Will Self’s personal view that I should not therefore walk in these remote areas, neither should anyone else come to that for by being remote no one could get to them by walking anyway.

    What I do is very common. Sometimes I am with other ramblers on an organised walk, sometimes I just meet them in those car parks that give the only practical access to footpaths that would otherwise be neglected.

    And neglected footpaths may well be abandoned altogether by local authorities. Will Self will prove to have been their innocent dupe who, by his misunderstanding of appropriate use of the car, justifies their removal of support for the majority of footpaths, leaving only those on the edges of towns or those in the very places he is saddened for because of their over use and exploitation.

    Someone with a real concern for ramblers and The Ramblers would find it easy to establish that the overwhelming majority of footpaths are not accessible by public transport. Adopting the fashionable anti-car stance will lead to the loss of thousands of paths. Will Self’s polarised distortion is both damaging and self defeating. He is no friend of The Ramblers.

      At 9:02 am on March 3rd, 2010 Rohan Wilson wrote:

    Will is exactly right: the car is a thoughtless, self-regarding way of travel. We end by destroying the thing we love – our countryside.

    And it’s much more enjoyable to travel out and back by bus: it turns an organised walk into a celebration, adds so much more.

    At Peterborough Ramblers we’ve been organising “Bus-Walks” for 10 years now, starting as a family group and growing a little older as time goes on. I’d be really pleased if new families joined us, and started a new generation…

    We walk at a modest pace, taking an interest in our surroundings, and stopping for a picnic and to explore. Rural businesses are pleased to see us, and in a period of financial cuts the City Council is retaining and improving the Sunday bus service we use.

    To those who say “It’s too complicated to go by bus” I would reply: give it a try. The more who do so the better services you’ll get.

      At 3:05 pm on March 4th, 2010 Ashley B wrote:

    By excessive and inconsiderate car use we end by destroying the thing we love – our countryside.

    I am dismayed that my local walking group, who I have enjoyed walking with regularly for a number of years, has introduced day walks that involve driving over 200 miles. I am not prepared to travel that far, and the committee has so far refused requests to put local alternative walks on the program for those who do not want to travel that far.

    http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2588466229#/group.php?gid=2588466229

      At 3:55 pm on March 4th, 2010 will-self.com » Blog Archive » Four wheels bad, two legs good wrote:

    [...] To read the rest of the article, go here. [...]

      At 10:55 am on March 11th, 2010 phil smith wrote:

    There is a very old and longstanding contradiction raising its head agin in this article: “everyone except me is destroying the solitude/beauty of the countryside”.

    Those last 18th and early 19th cntury Romantics who began the cult of the wilderness lived long enough to bemoan the effects of their prioneering.

    Prior to them the coutryside was a place of work. Now it is a place of industrial-style leisure.

    Those who seek a genuinely sublime encounter must, once again, work for it – deploying tactics of disruption, both phsyical and mental. As a noted psychogeographer Will Self should know what they are. And they can be practised both in solitude and a ‘man or woman of the crowd’.

    The Crab Man

      At 12:11 pm on March 11th, 2010 John Bosten wrote:

    Elmbridge, Surrey spend £thousands promoting walks often requiring 20 miles car use. few walks are for more than 2 hours for 5 miles, and many last 30minutes for a few hundred yards. I used to walk to the ‘Elmbridge walks’. I gave up many years ago, but I am still sent the bumph

      At 2:57 pm on March 11th, 2010 Jason Palmer wrote:

    When living in England, i often used the rambler website to find a list of local walks, and then go for the one I could easily reach by bus ( I had no car ).

    Bus to walk and back, unless you cadge a drink, is great, but, better on Saturday than Sunday as more buses.

    Learning to use the bus network is a great advantage for ramblers, no need for circular walks !

      At 3:41 pm on March 11th, 2010 Tim Woods wrote:

    Very interesting article. While John Smith is right that not all walks can be reached using public transport, a great many can. And unless more people start to leave the car behind to reach these walks, then more and more places will, as the author says, lose the very thing that makes so many want to go there – peace, quiet and something away from the urban areas that are taking over Britain. Don’t agree? Then try visiting the Lake District around Windermere and Ambleside on a summer saturday. Both towns well served by regular buses; both towns often with mile-long queues as people wait for a parking space. It’s not a black and white issue (you would need to be able to reach the bus at the other end of course) but very few people seem to want to make the effort.

    Please excuse the shameless self-promotion, but the issues Will puts forward were exactly those that led some friends and I to create Car Free Walks – http://www.carfreewalks.org – to collate walks across the UK that can be reached by public transport. Hopefully you will find some walks near you (and if not, go and find one and add it to the website!)

      At 1:41 pm on March 13th, 2010 Brian Wright wrote:

    Group rambles involving scores of cars far from home for a few hours are very wasteful of course. Camper van people can gain a broader perspective. As a climber and walker I enjoy spending enough time in an area to get to know it, draw it, paint it and live in it. A camper van can put you in touch with nature, rain and hail on your roof, owls and deer calling at night and animal tracks in the snow in the morning. It is possible to get permission to park in good spots. Having been a public rights of way officer I am fairly good at approaching farmers. As long as they can see you are on your own, and not part of a convoy, no problem usually. A walk can be a tantalising glimpse, a quick passing through, but a longer sojurn can be a real adventure. So, if you want to commune, don’t just go there and get from A to B, stay in an area, whether in a hostel or campsite, and study the terrain. Not everyone feels secure, alone in a camper van, so us who like solitude, like Will Self, are lucky to enjoy our own company. Radio 2 and 4 keep me entertained at night. Report path problems to the local authority, or clear away a bit of blocked path, as I do, in a new place, then you will be involved in the area, even if you live many miles away.

      At 6:16 pm on March 24th, 2010 Graham Rothery wrote:

    Is this the right kind of article in what is supposed to be the magazine for the membership of The Ramblers? We are told on the one hand the magazine is a membership benefit – and on the other it seems to be attacking the very activity which we indulge in. This populist writer is not just attacking car use but the very fact lots of people go for hikes or walks in the countryside and include in their scope such honeypots as Kinder Scout and all.
    So why should we beat ourselves up and deny ourselves what is in fact ours to enjoy? This is a free (to a large extent) country to go do as you like. Whilst man can man should – but of course taking some responsibility for their actions.
    I wonder if like many supposed Ramblers Association member benefits (the forum is another) this is an open e-mail to anyone as is the magazine as it is on sale to anyone who can find it on the newspaper shop shelf – and we have comments form non-members? Is Will Self a writer or a member? I suspect he is not a member and it would be good to know the answer. Other correspondents have commented about walk programmes (it has 2 m and an e unless it is a computer program) and local walking group issues. If this is a Ramblers Group then ensure you put on walks yourself by voluteering to take walks in the programme that suit you. If you don’t find the Chairman accommodating to the membership needs then approach your Area as the Group is part of the Area – we have to be mindful of the function we have as Ramblers Association Areas – the constitution we all have is clear and specific.
    (I am a member – an Area Chairman and walker)

      At 4:52 pm on April 1st, 2010 Ashley B wrote:

    I think the point the article is making is that if we all travel to honeypot locations to walk, our local area becomes neglected and the impact on the countrys most popular locations is much greater. Paths that are not used become overgrown and may be lost. Paths that are heavily used become erroded and may end up being pathed. I think the article is very relevent to the membership of the Ramblers. We should be aware & mindful of our impact on the environment that we love and make sensible choices to moderate that impact. The views expressed in the article are at the extreme end of the scale, but our activites do have some negative impact and we should not be ignorant of that.
    As ramblers we are united in our love of walking and should not exclude people on the basis of their beliefs. Surely people who care about the environment and want to minimise their impact on it are welcome in The Ramblers.

      At 10:46 am on June 24th, 2010 Dan James wrote:

    One of the greatest barriers preventing people ditchign the car is often a lack of information – sites such as travelline are great if you know theres a bus from a to b and simply want to know what time the next one is – however when people are on holiday or exploring new areas, particularly rural ones they need to know where the services are available, how these link with walking opportunties etc.

    With that in mind the Exmoor National Park Authority has recently laucnhed http://www.exploremoor.co.uk to promote a car free, care free Exmoor with interactive maps, 17 car free walks, a whle host of suggestions for exploring the moor without the car and much more besides.

    I hope some of you find it useful and am happy to receive any feedback.

Leave a comment

(required)

(required)

 

Forum

 

Join in walking discussions on the Ramblers forums. Click here.

 

Blogroll

 
 
 
Link to Walk Magazine Survey July 2009
 
Follow Walk Mag on Twitter