Walking Class Hero: A common treasury for all

When I’m at home it’s a rare day that I don’t walk down the Thames Path. True, more often than not, it’s the same stretch that takes me to and from the station or Sainsburys or my local, The Boaters Inn, or sometimes all three; rather than the Simon Armitage, 268 mile Pennine Way challenge of Walking Home. Nonetheless it makes the subject of National Trails very dear to my heart.

So if I didn’t exactly experience fear when I heard the government was conducting a review of England’s National Trails it wasn’t unbridled happiness either. Regular readers will know I occupy a different space on the political spectrum but after 2 years of this coalition my default reaction to almost any government initiative is to recall some lines from Woody Guthrie’s Pretty Boy Floyd:

As through this world I’ve rambled I’ve seen lots of funny men;
Some will rob you with a six-gun and some with a fountain pen.

And if you forgive the historical anachronism not to mention the absence of rhyme I take this to include cybercrime and Blackberry these days. As well as thoroughly trashing the economy – who has a good word to say about Osborne these days? – they keep tinkering with the environment. (And I probably don’t need to remind you what a success they made of their plan to sell off our forests.) So let me make this plain – I see the implementation of this report as it stands as a clear and present danger to the majority of walkers in England.

It is difficult to see how any of those who devised this plan have laced up boots let alone walked along any one of the thirteen English National Trails. As Roly Smith puts it so much more eloquently than me: “I was privileged to know Tom Stephenson, the creator of our first National Trail, the Pennine Way, as a friend, and I think I know what he would have said about these new proposals to create National Trail Partnerships. ‘Ee lad,’ he’d say in that warm, Lancashire burr, ‘that’s not what I had in mind at all.’ National Trails are a national, i.e. Government, responsibility – that’s after all why they are called “National” Trails. To entrust their management, protection and promotion to these proposed new voluntary bodies ignores the fact that they are a national, indeed, international, asset in our increasingly-beleaguered countryside. The Government should live up to its responsibility and not leave their management to already hard-pressed local authorities and volunteers.”

And it is the ‘National’ in National Trails that is at the heart of these dangerous proposals. Natural England, who currently manage and maintain National Trails, have begun discussions to hand this power to new Local Trail Partnerships made up of local authorities, business and volunteers. The Ramblers, who played a key role in establishing the trails, is concerned that the lack of a national champion to oversee, guide and support these Local Trail partnerships will leave them vulnerable; resulting in a fragmented network with inconsistent quality between trails and cash strapped Local Authorities unable to sustain funding.

I don’t know about you but I often struggle to articulate the joy, experience and worth of walking. As a result I often fall back on a variation of the Albert Einstein quote and end up saying: ‘Not everything of value can be counted and not everything that can be counted has value.’

Strangely in the case of the National Trails we can mount a formidable case of proven value that can be counted. Lets bullet point:

  •  Over 2000 miles of National Trails in England
  •  Attract over 12 million visitors each and every year
  •  First (Pennine Way) developed by the Ramblers and established in 1965
  •  This spans 10 local authorities, 3 national Parks & 1 Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty
  •  The South West Coast Path generates over £300 million for local communities per year
  •  And supports over 7500 jobs

Or as Stuart Maconie says: “I have walked several national trails, both for recreation and as two major outside broadcasts for Radio 2 on the Jurassic Coast and Hadrian’s Wall. I’ve seen firsthand how they increase people’s enjoyment, understanding and appreciation of our countryside and how much they benefit the economy by attracting tourists from across the world. I am therefore very concerned about any moves that will affect their upkeep, access and quality. I hope Natural England will make a sensible decision with regard to this. These are precious assets hard won and we should cherish them”

And let’s not forget these proposals also fail to incorporate plans to integrate the English Coastal Path – which will be designated a National Trail in its own right when it opens in full – this will see a doubling of the number of miles of National Trails in England.

Walkers tell me that they cherish our National Trails because they showcase much that is worth experiencing environmentally, historically and culturally, in England. They also love the fact that they can rely on the fact that these paths will be, in the main, well maintained and signposted. We often hear exotic foreign climes exalted as once in a lifetime destinations. In my experience this is far outweighed by walkers setting aside time to walk our National Trails from start to finish and achieve a lifelong dream.

The Ramblers played a pivotal role in establishing the National Trails and today is seriously concerned that government’s hastily conceived proposals could see a dramatic fall in the quality of the Trails. Paths could fall into disrepair, potentially obstructing access for the millions of people who enjoy the trails and who generate significant revenue for the local economy. They would like to see government rethink its plans and are ready to work with them to take a leading role in the future support and promotion of these national treasures.

Back in the 17th century Gerard Winstanley was expressing a much more extreme radical idea when he called for the land to be ‘a common treasury for all’ and it seems absurd that this limited, yet significant, successful application of his dream is under threat from an idiotic government that shows daily it has no concept of how normal people live and enjoy their lives. Let’s make sure that the future still sees a national body to champion our National Trails, they are after all, national treasures!

Don’t let the English National Trail network go Titanic – here’s how you can help:

Useful links:

Listen to:

Marvin Gaye – Whats Going On
Ramblin’ Jack Elliot – Pretty Boy Floyd
Gruff Rhys – Follow The Sunflower Trail (Theme Tune For a National Strike)
The National – Walk Off
Attila The Stockbrocker – March of the Levellers – The Digger´s Song – The World Turned Upside Down

 Follow me @walkngclasshero

 

Share this article

  3 Responses to “Walking Class Hero: A common treasury for all”

      At 12:18 pm on July 19th, 2012 Keith Badger - LongWalker wrote:

    Spot on!! As a Yank who loves walking the National Trails in the UK, and who has likewise walked a great bit of the National Parks and long-distance trails in the USA, the trail system you have is beyond anything to be found worldwide. The Ramblers should be equally proud and vigilant in keeping these national treasures protected, and open to all. I wish that every country would take note of, and emulate, the work accomplished!

      At 12:16 pm on August 14th, 2012 Sam wrote:

    Aside from any other consideration – what’s wrong with reviewing things? You instantly assume reviewing means cancelling, but it doesnt – you just hear about the reviews that lead to cancellations. Most reviews are compiled to maintain efficiency, make sure guidlines for best practise are followed and generally make sure things are running alright. You accuse a government who inherited the most difficult job a government has ever had since WWII of being ‘idiotic’ with obviously very little conception yourself of how people in the real world function. If people in the real world are given a straight up choice – we have the money to fund cancer care or national trails, which one do you think would win?

    The conclusions you have jumped to upon the mere suggestion that the current system is checked over sound paranoid. Your choice to deliver personal insults to government members and ridiculous accusations that on a purely chronological basis make no sense (ignoring that geographically and upon financial examination they continue not to) make you sound petty and ignorant of the situation you have a duty to manouver in. Your reference to the views of people from half a century ago lacks any relevance to the current climate. And if you’re so worried about the review finding the national trails a waste of money, surely instead of insulting the review you should be expending your energy pre-empting the findings of the review and finding counter arguments to it already? Or looking at the alternative proposals and working out how the Ramblers will react to their implimentation as a plan b? Just some suggestions as to how better you can spend your time than innaccurate propaganda that ultimately is more likely to hurt your cause in the view of people with the power to help than help it in any significant way

      At 10:40 am on August 15th, 2012 walking class hero wrote:

    One of the aims of this blog is to encourage dialogue so it is probably an appropriate point to emphasise that the views expressed are my own and not necessarily those of The Ramblers AND they are often explicitly political. On the broader questions of the environment I would offer the defence that ‘the government started it’ when David Cameron made the ludicrous statement of ‘being the greenest governnment ever’. As such they deserve to be measured constantly against this and also deserve ridicule when they fall short.

    From an economic viewpoint it would be fair to say Prof David Blanchflower http://www.dartmouth.edu/~blnchflr/ articulates views that I support. As such I think this government ‘insults’ us all by its insistence that the cuts are necessary ‘and that we are all in this together’.

    My paranoia over the review stems from the government’s track record so far – forestry land, solar panels, pasties etc. From my ‘real world view’ as a walker, taxpayer, citizen, amongst other things, the current National Trails model while not being perfect by and large works well and therefore feel this is just a political diversion.

    I probably haven’t addressed all your points but I’d like to end with 2 comments:

    1 that I believe your linking national trails and cancer care is entirely spurious. You might not be surprised to learn that I reckon the government would be better served collecting the taxes owed by corporations than making cuts to our NHS and other institutions

    2 keep the comments coming – walking really is a broad church with plenty of room for a wide spectrum of opinions (have I mixed my metaphors there?)

    walking class hero

Leave a comment

(required)

(required)

About this article

 
 

Join in walking discussions on the Ramblers forums. Click here.

 

Blogroll

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Follow Walk Mag on Twitter
 
 
Visit Get Walking Keep Walking